
|
|
Pay Wars: Should salaries be based Compensation is a touchy issue. Personal beliefs about what work is worth often clashes with
the system of compensation utilized by companies to guide pay. The system itself is often kept secret from employees and how
much we earn is information we're reluctant to share with
anyone but our spouses. The paycheque is perceived as a reflection of value of a
particular contribution to the organization. When the value
an individual assigns to work is different than the dollar
amount the company assigns, resentment builds and spills over
into performance. What does "fair pay" mean? In the old system, pay was defined by a number of years of
experience, amount of post-secondary education and training,
and a number of years with the company. As performance has been delved into more deeply in the past
decade, these characteristics are ineffective in determining
pay. Two people with the same education, years of experience and
work background can have completely different work performances.
Should they be paid the same? And then there are the informal characteristics used to
determine pay which no one talks about but everyone knows is a
factor. Have you gone along with the team and not 'rocked the boat'?
We say theoretically we want employees to voice opinions and
speak their minds, but we're still labelling this as difficult
behavior. Having the boss like you and gaining visibility through projects
where purse-string holders get to know you and what you've done
can influence pay. When salary review time comes, we need to
know the boss will recall what we've done throughout the year. Maybe we're so reactive to the topic of compensation because it
sometimes appears 'sneaky'. Many organizations have yearly secret bonus systems that a select
few are allowed to participate in but no one understands the
criteria by which this is decided. Perks are used as part of
compensation - parking, a company vehicle, hockey tickets and
golf tournaments. The whole aspect of pay appears out of whack. We have CEOs who
make millions of dollars a year and we ask ourselves is anyone
really worth that much? Is that contribution so significantly
different? Perhaps we need to view pay differently. Rather than it be an
amount engraved in stone that grows as our career grows, it
should be a factor that changes as performance and results change. If strategic planning, business outcomes, the business cycle,
individual performance and performance review were linked, we'd
have a better picture of what results we're expected to achieve. We would then have a way to measure our actual performance against
the projected outcomes, and a picture of how well we're doing
against defined standards. This might help us to be better equipped to determine how to
compensate different work and skills. The Performance group appreciates your feedback. E-mail us at Tpg547@aol.com
For no-cost, no obligation information on how we can help save you time and frustration in the recruiting process,
e-mail_Terri@recruit2hire.com with your contact information.
![]() terri-robinson @ recruit2hire.com
Terri Robinson, President "Your business depends on your people; Our business is helping you to find the best"
This site designed and maintained by Robinson & Associates.Copyright ©1999-2004 by Robinson & Associates. All Rights Reserved. |